Dear California Organic Farmers:
I was distressed to read that I will no longer be able to purchase raw California almonds. The article I read stated that I will not be able to do this because the growers association is concerned about 12 cases of contamination. The article went on to say that the growers association are concerned about their reputation and so they want to be safe and not allow purchases of raw almonds. Please don't do this. Don't deny me the right to make decisions about my own food safety. Please allow me and any others who wish to do so to continue to buy raw almonds. I'm old enough to decide what risks I am willing to assume please, I don't need someone to make these kinds of decisions for me. If you are truly concerned about your reputation, please consider the number of people who will not appreciate your decision to "protect" them. If nothing else, offer both raw and processed almonds and include a disclaimer for the raw nuts thereby allowing people to make their own choices. Please let us continue to purchase raw California almonds.
Dear Folks At Living Tree,
I think it's a disgrace that almonds are now going to be fumigated. Unfortunately, many of the same people that have tried over the years to ban or limit dosage dramatically of vitamins, etc. are the same ones behind this fumigation. And yes, I'm sorry to say, but unfortunately, many of the politicians that I'm sure you folks have supported in the past and have thought that they represented equality for all and opportunity are the biggest backers for the monopolistic Medication Association, Food and Drug Administration.
And yes, I have seen first hand way back in the 70s how people like Ted Kennedy made sure that I wasn't able to obtain apricot kernels, citing the dangers associated with eating them, yet, at the same time, allowing dangerous drugs, prescription and over the counter, to continue to be dispensed.
Yes, it is a real shame what they're done to a perfect food like raw almonds, and yes, policies like this will continue under the guise of saving us from ourselves. Pure hypocrisy! This is why we must carefully scrutinize the candidates and where they stand on such important issues like freedom of choice in folks making their own decisions concerning their health.
Regards,
Dennis Guerrerio,
Whitestone, New York
Dear Ms. Miars:
Almonds are a major part of my diet. I need my food to be truly natural,organic and raw. No longer having access to true raw almonds is a an affront to my health, my freedoms as a human being and an American citizen.
I respectfully urge you to engage your organization's power to stop the universal pasteurization/fumigation order of the California almond board. Raw foodists depend on almonds as the premier nut in our diets. Our growing tribe of discerning consumers are loyal and dependable customers who will choose to stop eating almonds if you fail us.
Sincerely,
Joseph Frank
San Francisco, CA
Dear CCOF:
I just heard about the Almond Pasteurization that is to take place on September 1, 2007. I am outraged, angered, appalled and saddened at what is happening here. As a person that cannot tolerate dairy products, I have been making Raw Organic Almond Milk for my family for years now. We use soaked/sprouted almonds in many of our delicious Raw dishes. How can this be that the FDA can be allowed to have so much power over what we eat? I do not understand this. It is VERY wrong.
People choose to pay the higher price for organic raw foods for their health and well being. I choose to pay the higher price, but to pay a higher price for adulterated foods is unacceptable! What happened to the freedoms that we are granted by our US Constitution? Are we REALLY free to choose or deceptively free and controlled by our caring Government, FDA, and pharmaceutical companies? Is this another way to increase the numbers of various sickness and cancer cases?
CCOF: We who choose Raw Unadulterated foods for ourselves and our families ask you to please protect your consumers and all those who value their Freedom of Choice by fighting aggressively to keep your almonds pure, raw, and unadulterated for the generations of today and those to come.
Thank you,
Denise
It has been brought to my attention that the California Almond Board is considering a potentially hazardous use of chemicals to prevent salmonella in crops.
To wit, "The vast majority of almonds, however, would be fumigated with propylene oxide. It is a substance very much like ether. It is classified as "possibly carcinogenic to humans" by the International Agency for Research on Cancer. The chemical is classified as "possibly" carcinogenic only because there have been no takers for the prospect of imbibing the stuff to see what would happen. Propylene oxide belongs to the so-called "radiomimetic" genotoxic chemicals group, because it induces similar biological end-points as ionizing radiation. The chemical's effects on food include gene mutation, DNA strand breaks, and neoplastic cell transformation. That's why propylene oxide treatment of foods is banned in the European Union and other countries concerned with the health of their citizenry."
I ask, on behalf of your constituency, that you intercede in this area and ask that they use another method (which DOES exist) as a prophylactic to further outbreaks of salmonella.
Thank you,
Tim Shullberg
Long Beach, CA
Hello to those of the CCOF.
I am a Canadian almond lover, who would prefer her raw almonds
to be in as natural a state as possible when I consume them.
I think it is atrocious that there is to be an all around pasteurization
order by order of the California Almond Board. There is a great
deal of literature that proves that pasteurization, irradiation
and genetic modification of foods we eat is at the basis of a
great deal of long term health issues we the consumers would
deal with. And there is nothing worse than not even realizing
that is what one is eating. We deserve at the very least the
choice to do so, by having it labelled on our purchases. It behoves
you as an organization, as almond growers yourselves to protest
this and stop it when you have the chance.
I am sure that once you have all the facts at your disposal,
you will know what to do and how to mobilize. And I am sure that
you will be able to proceed swiftly in this matter because of
course time is of the essence.
Yours,
Sheri Patterson
The key word is: freedom of choice.
Freedom to live where you want
Freedom to choose where you work
And Freedom to choose what you eat,
And know what you are eating.
If someone chooses to eat mainstream commercial food, then that is a choice.
But if someone wants to make the choice to eat raw, unadulterated organic almonds What happens if that choice is no longer available? Our freedom of choice is gone. And that is a sad day when what our people can no longer make a conscious choice; It is made for them.
Please, CCOF: Protect your consumers, and all people who love Freedom of choice By fighting to keep your almonds pure & raw for generations to come.
Thank-you.
NaTasha
DEAR CCOF:
I am a woman living in Virginia. I have always grown my own vegetables
without pesticides. I love reaping the harvest of what I have
sown and God has blessed with life.
I have raised three children to appreciate the health-giving
properties of fresh fruit, vegetables and pure water.
I understand that you are being pressured by government agencies
to pasteurize the almonds that you sell to consumers.
Please realize that to many raw vegans, pure raw almonds are
a main staple of life and that once they are pasteurized they
are no longer raw. Fumigating, irradiating and pasteurizing is
tampering with the wonderful perfect nut. Please listen to what
we are asking you to do and use any legal means possible to stop
this mandatory order that is to take effect on September 1, 2007
Respectfully submitted,
Karen H. Bennett
Stafford, Virginia
Dear CCOF:
Me and my family and friends eat raw almonds everyday. We rely
heavily on the protein and minerals in almonds to fuel and nurture
us in school, work, and athletic events. I would be devastated
if I could no longer get raw, non-pasteurized almonds from the
central valley. Please do what ever you can to fight the mandatory
pasteurization order that is supposedly starting in September.
Please email me if there is anything further that I can do to
help this cause.
Sincerely, Oliver Mork
Dear Secretary Johanns,
I am extremely upset to hear that the rule recently passed about
the mandatory pasteurization of almonds is due to go into effect
on September the 1st this year. If you do not AT LEAST allow
raw almonds to be sold (at a fair price) in this country, you
will be, in essence, assisting in destroying my health.
Additionally, if you allow mandetory pasteurization of almonds
to occur, it is only a matter of time when this practice will
become mandetory for all nuts and seeds -- in essence destroying
the nutrient content contained within -- and again, adding to
the destruction of my health.
Raw nuts and seeds are my PRIMARY source of quality proteins.
RAW almonds are also one of my chief sources of calcium.
I am sure you are aware of the many health promoting aspects
of almonds. If not, it is time for you to do your research --
you have no right to make decisions affecting the health of people
in this country if you do not have adequate knowledge about what
foods are nutrient dense and how heating/cooking destroys the
majority of nutrients in our foods.
I am well aware of the "conflicting" research pertaining
to "pasteurized" vs. "raw" and "organic" vs. "conventional".
Much of this research is funded by those who would benefit from
the destruction of healthy food sources, thus the validity of
these studies is suspect since statistics can be made to "lie".
Businesses -- and the people who run them -- seem to be more
interested in making a profit than in helping the general public.
They look for the shortest, most cost-effective way of providing "good
enough" products to the public for the highest price feasible.
They are concerned only with IMMEDIATE results -- not LONG TERM
EFFECTS.
HOPEFULLY, you are NOT one of them -- and instead are one of
the people who chooses integrity over personal gain, who "sees" the
long reaching effects of these types of laws on not only the
general population, BUT ALSO ON YOUR OWN CHILDREN, GRANDCHILDREN,
and other relatives who are impacted by the quailty (or lack
thereof) of the available food sources.
IF SO -- PLEASE do thorough research on this subject. Pay attention
to the statistics AND THE VALIDITY OF THE STUDIES. Pay attention
to WHO PAID FOR the studies -- and be aware of any hidden agendas
on their part.
If you do, you will most likely discover the truth.
For example -- some of the "truth" as it pertains
to almonds -- when the raw nuts are heated/pasteurised, the fats
change composition and they no longer deliver the same nutritional
benefits to the body (instead, becoming detrimental, especially
to the liver and gall bladder). Also, the calcium content becomes
difficult for the body to assimilate and utilize.
It is common knowledge that foods in their "raw" state
are significantly healthier than cooked foods -- that is why
we are advised to eat lots of RAW fruits and vegetables.
PLEASE support the health of the people in this country by SUPPORTING
HEALTHY SOURCES OF FOODS AND -- IF NOT ACTIVELY PROMOTING "RAW" (and
organic) FOODS -- AT LEAST PROTECT THEIR AVAILABILITY FOR THOSE
WHO CHOOSE TO EAT UNTAINTED, HEALTHY, "RAW" FOODS.
A person of integrity could do no less.
Thank you for your time. Sincerely,
Millicent Pagan
Bronx, NY
Dear CCOF
The recent decision to pasturize almonds is absolutely not needed
and in fact an assault to those of us who are health seekers and
want food as close to the way nature presents it to us.
My fear for myself and those to follow is the ever growing de regulation
of Organic Standards with an increase in irradiated and pastuerized
food. At least we should be allowed a choice.
As a Registered Nurse with years of exposure to the horrors of
adverse effects by medication the FDA deemed safe, there is a similar
essense to this totally unjustified rule to pastuerize almonds.
Please let me know anything I can do to contact my local politicians
or anyone else who has a say so regarding these matters.
Janice Morris RN
Daly City, CA
Dear Sirs:
We are a family of four in Texas. All of our lives were changed
when my wife began to center our family's diet on organic,
raw vegetarian fare. I was skeptical at first, especially because
of my preference for diary products and eggs. However, as I could
see the differences in the quality of our health become increasingly
obvious, my skepticism changed to a kind of amazement at the
transforming aspects of this change in lifestyle.
Nuts and especially raw almonds are an important component of the
vegan diet as they are used in many forms including raw almond
milk. Given that almond production is predominately California-based,
you have a special responsibility as a steward of this agricultural
product for the nation. Please reconsider your ruling as regards
requiring the pasteurizing of California almonds; that segment
of the market that demands raw, organic almonds will likely continue
to expand. Heat kills enzymes and mainstream scientific evidence
continues to mount that bleaching enzymes is profoundly detrimental
to the nutritional value of foods. California enjoys a national
reputation as a progressive, intelligent state as far as a number
of its state policies are concerned. We hope your actions will
be in keeping with this tradition.
Sincerely,
G Chandler & Oksana Vaughan, Paul (5) and David (2)
Dear Ms. Miars,
I was shocked when I heard the decision to label fumigated or irradiated
almonds as organic. As someone who is just starting out on
a raw foods diet I depend on raw almonds as a valuable source
of protein. I do understand that your organization was left
out of the decision process which is equally shocking. Please
do everything in your power with the support of the raw foods
community to stop this ridiculous declaration from be implemented.
For too long corporations in this country have been allowed
to lie to the public about their activities and especially
when it comes to food labeling and processing. We as a community
need to stand up and be counted using what ever peaceable means
we have to alter this course of deceit. Please find a way to
fight this awful practice now so that we can still have some
measure of faith in foods that we eat.
Patrick McIntyre
Dear CCOF,
I am really sad to hear that the rule recently passed about
the mandatory pasteurisation of almonds is due to go into effect
on September the 1st this year. As a raw foodist, raw almonds
are one of my chief sources of protein, calcium, B vitamins and
healthy fats, besides being the only nut to have an overall alkalising
effect on the body, which helps people to heal from illnesses.
Raw almonds help nourish the bones and teeth in particular. Raw
almonds have been and will be especially useful to me as a raw
foodist they are calming on the nervous system, packed
with vital life-force energy and easy to use in many ways, from
eating whole as snacks to making replacement milks/cheeses etc
for people who are intolerant to dairy products.
When raw nuts are heated/pasteurised, they lose their vital
life-force, the fats change composition and they no longer deliver
the same nutritional benefits to the body (instead, becoming
detrimental in fact, especially to the liver and gall bladder).
Raw, living foods in their most natural whole state are extremely
healing and have been documented as helping people reverse any
number of health complaints, from obesity to cancers to infertility.
It concerns me that if this new rule DOES go through in respect
to the almonds, it will set a precedent for such laws in regard
to other produce too and access to these healing raw foods will
become limited.
I urge you to do whatever you can in your power to turn this
rule around NOW, to ensure the continued availability of truly
raw almonds (and other produce) for ourselves and those generations
to come.
Yours sincerely,
Kristin
Seattle, WA
To: US Secretary of Agriculture Mike Johanns
From: Kristina Bystrom, Kenmore, WA, USA
Dear Secretary Johanns,
On Friday, March 30th, the California Almond Board passed a
mandatory almond pasteurization order. It requires that all almonds
be pasteurized beginning September 1, 2007. I am extremely concerned
about this rule, and I implore you to do whatever it takes to
turn this rule around right NOW, to ensure the continued availability
of truly raw almonds (and other produce) now and for generations.
I, as the consumer, must be allowed to make my own choice whether
or not to purchase pasteurized or raw almonds.
It is equally disturbing that this ruling makes no distinction
made between conventional grown and organic almonds. Both are
subject to the same pasteurization order despite the fact that
the standards of sanitation and cleanliness are higher with organic.
The California Certified Organic Farmers (CCOF), the largest
body of organic almond growers was not invited to participate
in the hearings on before the mandate became law, though organic
almonds bring in more sales revenue than any other organic fruit
or vegetable in California. Seventy-six members of CCOF are either
almond growers or handlers.
The new regulation to sterilize almonds coincides with the recent
announcement by the Food and Drug Administration that it intends
to relax its labeling requirements for irradiated food. The FDA
proposal will also allow irradiation... to be called pasteurization...
(Press Release, The Cornucopia Institute, 4/6/07)
Personally, my diet consists of only raw, unprocessed, organic
foods. Raw almonds add a significant nutritional value to this
diet, providing an important source of protein, calcium, B vitamins
and healthy fats, and helping nourish the bones and teeth. When
almonds are pasteurized/heated, their composition is completely
changed, reducing or eliminating much of the benefits or eating
them raw, and even causing detrimental effects on the body.
I am concerned that the required pasteurization of almonds in
California may lead to similar rules for other raw foods. As
someone who is thriving on a raw food diet, I can't emphasize
strongly enough how detrimental this would be to me and the thousands
of other Americans choosing to eat raw food for health.
Please do not let this happen. Allow me the choice, as a citizen
of a free country.
Thank you,
Kristina Bystrom
Kenmore, WA, USA
Dear CCOF,
With regard to the proposed regulation that would mandate
sterilization of future Ca. organic almond crops- please let
me know
what I can do to help you halt this bit of anti- organic thuggery.
Sincerely,
Irene Holroyd
Seattle, WA
Dear California Certified Organic Farmers,
We are now facing what noted primate researcher Dr. Jane Goodall
predicted. Namely we are facing the greatest threat to the survival
of the human species: apathy. That's right Dr. Goodall predicted
that apathy will be the greatest threat to the human species'
chance of survival. If we refrain from voicing our concerns over
GMO, irradiated and pasteurized foods then we might as well give
up. Please please use your considerable influence to lobby against
the madness of steaming and chemically processing foods, Almonds,
and then labeling them "Raw" or "Organic." If
we are restricted from voting with our wallets by "Big-Brother" then
there is little hope for us.
Donald Lindsay
Dear CCOF,
It has come to my attention that a mandatory almond pasteurization
order is being passed by the California Almond Board. I vehemently
object to this as I make it a point to ingest as much fresh,
live, organic, non-pasteurized, irradiated food as I possibly
can. Unfortunately, this is seemingly more and more difficult
to do.
I take great comfort in knowing that CCOF exists and has the
clout to represent those of us who want desperately to continue
eating foods as nature intended. It is in this spirit that I
write this letter with the request that you continue to mobilize
against the FDA’s proposed “relaxation” of
labeling requirements organic standards and this most recent
regulation to sterilize our almonds.
With deep appreciation for the work you do,
M. Lanz
Lower Lake, CA 95457
It is so disheartening to see what is happening to our countries'
food and medical industry. I'm saddened that the CCOF were (I'm
sure intentionally) not invited to attend the hearings regarding
the pasteurizing of raw almonds. It seems that big corporation
bottom line has become more important than human life. I don't
doubt that other standardized almond/nut producers were involved
in passing this legislation. The only way that we can protect
our ability to choose how to maintain our own health is by taking
a stand. I urge you to do what it takes to keep this new legislation
from taking away more or our rights. Thank you for your time.
Sincerely,
Dana Holle
Dear CCOF,
It has come to my attention that a mandatory almond pasteurization
order is being passed by the California Almond Board. I vehemently
object to this as I make it a point to ingest as much fresh,
live, organic, non-pasteurized, irradiated food as I possibly
can. Unfortunately, this is seemingly more and more difficult
to do.
I take great comfort in knowing that CCOF exists and has the
clout to represent those of us who want desperately to continue
eating foods as nature intended. It is in this spirit that I
write this letter with the request that you continue to mobilize
against the FDA’s proposed “relaxation” of
labeling requirements organic standards and this most recent
regulation to sterilize our almonds.
With deep appreciation for the work you do,
Gary Lanz
Hermosa Beach,CA 90254
To the fine folks at the CCOF:
I am a recent convert to 'thoughtful eating.' No, that's not
a new diet or a new book, it's just a catch-all term for how
my eating has changed over the last half-year or more. I started
thinking and reading about how my foods are produced, and what
effects my foods have on my mood and health (both acute and chronic)
and I made a lot of changes.
One of the most simple changes I made was buying Organic. Another,
more difficult change I've made, is trying to eat more raw foods.
Which brings me to the point of this letter.
I'm VERY concerned about this California Almond Board mandate
to treat or pasteurize all almonds. It flies in the face of healthy
eating, and of equal importance, freedom of choice!! I already
pay a big price for some corn products shipped from Australia
which are GMO-free, don't make me support large energy consumption
thru shipping by making California almonds processed.
Please fight the good fight on this on my behalf and the behalf
of other thoughtful consumers who want to eat raw foods, want
to eat pesticide-free foods, and want to eat foods produced close
to them.
Lara Gifford RN
Portland, Oregon
Dear CCOF members:
On Friday, March 30th, the California Almond Board passed a
mandatory almond pasteurization order. It requires that all almonds
be pasteurized beginning September 1, 2007.
Please protest this order. I love my raw organic almonds and
buy hundreds of pounds a year from my local organic food store
for my family. I try to buy local whenever possible and would
be saddened to have to get raw almonds from a non-U.S. source
if the California Almond Board and the FDA follow through with
this mandate unchecked.
Thank you for all you do to keep consumers safe with certified
organic food.
Nicole Francis Birdeau
Dear CCOF,
The Almond Board of California (ABC) recently received approval
for their Action Plan and Mandate concerning Pasteurization of
Almonds.
I am extremely concerned about this aggressive plan to pasteurize
all California almonds. This mandate has made no allowances for
the raw, organic consumer.
Will a consumer have to become a DV to purchase unpasteurized
almond products? This is the only exception I could find.
I am a consumer of organic, raw almonds. Almonds are a primary
part of my living-foods, healthy lifestyle. I slightly sprout
raw, organic almonds to maximize their nutrition. I eat or make
almond milk from the sprouted almonds. I also purchase organic,
raw, sprouted almond butter from a number of vendors in California.
I spend at between $200 to $250 a month on California sprouted,
raw, organic almonds, and/or almond butter due to the high nutritional
value of raw, organic, sprouted almonds.
The two methods that ABC proposed for “pasteurizing” are
steaming, blanching, oil roasting and spraying with Propylene
Oxide creates an almond that I do not want to consume.
As an educated consumer, I know that a steamed (blanched) or
oil roasted almond will not sprout. The fragile enzymes are severely
reduced or completely lost. The nutritional value and micronutrients
does not remain the same, it is in fact, reduced and changes
after steaming, or roasting. ABC published on their website, “pasteurization
such as steam, moist heat, other thermal processes and non-thermal
treatments that will not adversely affect the characteristics
of a “raw” almond.” This is simply NOT TRUE.
Also, as you are well aware, spraying almonds with Propylene
oxide does not make almonds any safer for consumption. In fact,
it makes them more toxic. It nullifies almonds being labeled
organic. Propylene Oxide is a government regulated hazardous
substance and known Carcinogen, and suspected as a developmental
toxicant, gastrointestinal liver toxicant, immunotoxicant, neurotoxicant,
reproductive toxicant, skin and sensory organ toxicant. Spraying
with this substance is NOT pasteurizing, in the original intended
meaning of the word.
The residues left on almonds from this chemical will damage
a person’s health over time and damage reproduction. Growers,
shellers, and handlers using this chemical will also be harmed.
Two cases of Salmonella do not seem justify this aggressive
mandate with such negative consequences. Especially, when there
is time for a more moderate approach to be taken.
In the case of the spinach, romaine lettuce and mix salad greens
has a far worse outbreak of Salmonella, the problem was found
with the specific farms and dealt with relatively quickly. Currently,
people continue eating these food items and reap the health benefits.
Salmonella, stated on ABC’s website is “spread by
contaminated water, poor fertilization methods and other agricultural
practices.” A more appropriate plan of action is that the
clean farming practices should be taught and farming practices
should be monitored for prevention.
Also, Salmonella is spread by handlers not practicing hand washing.
Therefore, a more appropriate plan of action would be that the
handlers need to be educated to practice hand washing. The facilities
need to have areas for hand washing.
As an educated consumer, I thoroughly wash my almonds (and all
my organic fruits and vegetables) before sprouting, using organic,
non-toxic, fruit wash. I am well aware that the California vendors
that I purchase organic, raw, sprouted almond butter from handle
their almonds with extreme care. That is why I’m willing
to pay up to $35 for a 16oz. jar of raw, organic, almond butter
that is processed in a clean facility that washes their equipment
thoroughly between batches.
My lifestyle consists of maximizing nutrition and minimizing
toxins. My health has changed for the better due to this lifestyle.
I have personally overcome many serious illnesses due to eating
clean (from toxic chemicals) living raw foods. Truly raw, organic,
sprouted almonds have been a major contributor to my new found
good health.
This mandate threatens my heath and my healthy lifestyle due
to that fact that California truly raw, organic almonds are a
major part of my diet. I hope you see that this mandate threatens
the consumer and does not protect the consumer.
The market trend is that many consumers are shifting to organic.
This lowers their exposure to toxic chemical residues and genetically
modified foods. Consumers are realizing the health benefits of
eating a whole food, raw, organic diet.
This mandate will sabotage many intricate areas of the almond
industry, as far as, raw, organic almonds are concerned. Did
they include the CCOF in there development of this plan? They
made no distinction between organic and non-organic almonds.
What research have they done on the new market trends of organic
and how this mandate will potentially affect California’s
almond industry?
I predict that once organic, raw consumers find out about this
mandate, California Almond growers will lose a large portion
of these types of consumers, buyers, and handlers. We need to
act now. We need to find some kind of solution or work around.
Consumers should continue to have access to purchase truly raw,
California organic almonds that are unpasteurized. I will not
purchase “raw” organic California almonds which are
not actually raw, but instead steamed or sprayed with a carcinogen.
Financially, it can be translated to this, the California almond
industry will lose $3,000 per year (at least) from me, if a proper
solution is not found. It’s obvious that a significant
amount of my income goes to purchasing California raw, organic
almonds and almond butter, as well as, organic, raw foods. I
am one consumer, but I speak for many.
I want to buy from California, and support USA farming and industry,
but this mandate will change that, if no action is taken. My
health and the health of others comes first. I will encourage
all consumers to do what ever they can to help revise or change
this mandate. If this mandate goes through, I will encourage
consumers to avoid all California almonds unless they are truly
raw and organic.
It seems unwise for the Almond Board of California to continue
with this Plan of Action/Mandate in this way.
Please, fight to have them REVISE this Plan of Action/Mandate
to make exceptions for raw, organic consumers.
Finally, the message relayed via on ABC’s website states
that they are committed, “to providing the safest and highest
quality product possible for consumers”.
If this is the truth, then they need to empower the health consumer
to have truly raw, organic almonds.
Thank you for your help in this matter, if I can do anything
to help don’t hesitate to email or call. In the meantime,
I am writing letters and emails to inform as many people about
this issue.
Sincerely,
Seana Wood
Philadelphia, PA
I live in Idaho in the mountains. I can not grow my own organic
almonds and I am relying on these folks in California to do it
for me. Please do not force this fumigation on the almonds. This
is a complete and natural food all by itself and I personally
don't want mine tampered with. Please give me the freedom to
keep this choice.
Sincerely,
Ginny Blakeslee Breen
Hailey, ID 83333
Dear Almond Growers Association,
As a very environmentally and health conscious person who eats
mostly raw foods, raw organic almonds are a STAPLE of my diet.
I buy generally 25 to 50 pounds from california growers per year.
Almonds are very healthful protein food and one of the only nuts
that are not acid forming. I enjoy making milks, loaves deserts
and burgers with them. If they were to be fumigated (no longer
organic and clean) or steamed (no longer raw) I would no longer
use them and neither would the many many health conscious people
in our country who rely on them as a regular and very important
component of their diet. Please do not let the government take
away our almonds and our freedom to have a choice.
Thank you, sincerely, Virginia
Millfield, Ohio, 45761
Our country was built on freedom foremost, as well as common
sense and democracy. This issue of forcing all almonds to be
pasteurized takes away our freedom of choice and does not make
sense. Who is afraid of almonds anyway? Humans for millennia
have survived quite well without irradiating or pasteurizing
their food.
There are so many good farmers out there that can produce good
almonds and all kinds of foods without the need for pasteurizing.
But, recent improper factory farming by a few gives rise to extra
fear and controls. The goal should not be to punish everyone
including the consumer for these mistakes, it is to increase
standards on the one hand without destroying the nutrients and
enzymes of these tremendous foods, while preserving the nutrition
of our very important farm food on the other. Pasteurization
sterilizes almonds and destroys nutrients and enzymes making
them an inferior dead food.
There are many great farmers that are the backbone of our nation
and can produce almonds without having to resort to such desperate
measures. These wonderful dedicated farmers are quite capable
and have done so throughout their generations of farming. Regulate
the bad farmers, praise the good farmers and above all, don't
make everyone a loser with this legislation by supplying inferior
food quality because of the mistakes of a few.
Sincerely yours, Joseph Lucier
Hi there,
I eat almonds almost everyday. I have purchased my almonds
from growers in California to have here in Alberta, Canada. I
have made almonds a part of a healthy diet/lifestyle I have adopted.
One of the most important things to me is to be able to eat my
almonds raw with all of their inherit enzymes and natures goodness
intact. I am very disturbed to realize that I may not be able
to receive truly raw almonds this fall. I resent being told that
I cannot choose what is best for me because your board is taking
away the growers choice to sell me "untreated" "unpasteurized" almonds.
At the very least I believe I should be able to purchase organic "untreated
in any way" almonds. I believe that almonds should be eaten
the way nature prepares them. Who would suppose that they could
improve on nature's miracle? If almonds are contaminated by samonella
bacteria, maybe the environment where the almonds came from should
be the first line of defence in preventing future outbreaks.
If high quality organic growing was the norm instead of big agri-business
techniques I believe we would have never encountered this situation
in the first place.
Thank you for your time,
Lara
Greetings Executive Director!
I am writing you with the intention of supporting the highest
interests of organic growers (and consumers) by offering thoughtful
reasoning into the current situation regarding "mandatory" almond "pasteurization".
Based on a recent reply I received from the almond board, I
believe that there were only three incidents where e-coli was
claimed to have been traced to almond growers over the past couple
years. The reply made no mention of any personal injuries due
to the contamination. More importantly there is no mention that
any of these incidents involved organic growers! If no organic
growers are suspect in e-coli contamination then, IMO, it is
perfectly reasonable to have the organic growers exempted from "mandatory" almond "pasteurization".
The reasoning is that the organic growers already have their
own standards in place that assure a high enough quality product
that meets the approval and satisfaction of the consumer. As
far as I know there are no consumer complaints over issues of
contamination before the either the almond board or the organic
certifiers. In other words there is no issue with any organic
almond grower that warrants "mandatory" almond "pasteurization".
I believe these facts deserve to be stated in an affidavit of
truth and submitted to the almond board, th FDA and all concerned
parties with a notice that the affidavit will stand as the truth
in law unless refuted point by point within a 30 day time frame.
Also in my letter to the almond board I asked for information
about the true nature and legal effect of the "final rule" that
was published in the Federal Register. Specifically I asked if
the rule is "positive law that is directly applicable to
all American growers ...". I did not get any reply to that!
I personally want absolute clarity on this point and feel that
my basic due diligence is required so that I can have right understanding
of this situation! I do not see a Constitutional power granted
to the FDA whereby they can exercise lawful authority over the
agricultural practices of California almond growers. However,
I believe the commercial growers themselves are free to bind
themselves to a self-imposed "agricultural"
practice as it pleases them but that the organic growers do not
have to volunteer into that! I'd like to do what I can to support
and encourage the organic almond growers to speak-up and be heard
on this issue! :D)
Please help me gain the full disclosure on the legal nature
of this situation and especially to support full reservation
of the Rights of the organic growers to preserve and defend what
they have before it is compromised!
Cordially,
Chef Jem
Nutrition Therapy Chef
To whom it may concern,
Please do what ever you can, use whatever resources you have
to fight the destruction of organic raw almonds. My family among
so many other along and all the people of the future need to
be able to eat food without poison on it.
Thank you,
Lynn Cheatham
Dear People at CCOF,
The alarming news about the new order for 'pasteurizing' almonds
starting in September of this year has just reached me. This
simply must not be allowed to happen.
The mainstream food market is already a dangerous gamble --
one never knows what chemicals and toxins are at the dinner table.
I try to be aware of exactly what my family eats. I buy organic
food whenever possible, and stay away from genetically engineered
food. It is harder to find and more expensive, but many people
and families make this commitment. CCOF and other such entities
make this possible, and we are so grateful they exist and trust
and rely on them for the quality of our food.
Almonds are a great part of my family's food intake, in particular
organic, California grown, CCOF approved ones. I understand that
the CCOF was not invited to participate in the discussions regarding
this law -- this is an outrage. I sincerely hope you are putting
pressure forth to fight this ridiculous order. Please, get the
word out there. If petitions are needed, I am sure many people
will sign them. If other actions need to be taken, there will
be plenty of support from people who do not like to eat propylene
oxide for breakfast. However, the CCOF must be the entity to
spearhead this battle and to win it, backed by the multitude
of concerned consumers.
Please, fight. Call on us for support.
Thank you.
Boryana Alexandrova
Executive Director, CCOF:
Please mobilize whatever protest you can against the mandatory
pasteurization of almands by the California Almond Board. The
continuous attack on our health freedoms is frustrating, demoralizing,
and incongruous with the principles of freedom on which our country
was founded. I have studied nutrition on my own for 36 years.
I practice what I could only have learned through my own study
and experiences. What I can say about this issues is that the
difference between consuming a raw almond butter and a roasted
one is like night and day. The raw is very health promoting.
The roasted is relatively worthless by comparison. Thank you.
Please accept my good wishes for a fortunate outcome in this
matter.
Russ Harvey, Florence, AZ.
To Whom It May Concern (the USDA, etc):
Once again big business is in cahoots with the government and
not listening to public opinion. Requiring carcinagenic gassing
or heating of raw almonds is not ok. If factory farms followed
safer procedures like REAL organic farming (vs the sham that
was passed as 'organic' certified recently), then salmonella
and other organisms would not be an issue. Factory farming is
ruining this country.
Do NOT vote in mandatory gassing or heating of almonds.
Act with integrity, not as puppets of big business, for once.
Miriam Kligerman
Dear Ms. Miars,
I am the owner of a Health Food Store located in San Jose, CA.
I'm writing to you today to request that you protest the pasteurization
of almonds or, at least, request a separate marketing order for
organic almonds. We rely on raw almonds for our customers and
want to continue buying our sources in California. If they are
pasteurized, with their enzymes killed, we will not purchase
them. We love Raw Almonds!
Sincerely,
Judy Burnham
Owner
Beehive Health & Nutrition
I am passionately against the pasteurization of almonds. I have
spent the better part of a year eating raw food to detoxify my
body. I read labels religiously and only use certified raw (unprocessed,
unheated, etc) organic food. This new law takes the choices away
from consumers and smacks of "Big Brother". Who are
they to tell me what I can and cannot have? At the very least,
it should be mandatory to disallow any product not live to be
labeled raw. Thank you.
Christy Carl
Administrative Assistant
Christian Brothers Conference
Executive Director
CCOF
As an local California organic foods consumer for 30 years, the
recent pasteurization order from the California Almond Board
is alarming, not just because of the impact on one my favorite
staples, but also because of the impact on my freedom to choose
what I consume in the market place. If this was an issue of some
good being imported from a jungle where new viruses were emerging,
there might be an argument for public health policy. But it sounds
like special interests fleecing the public once again. I urge
ccof to take a stand and confront this political matter.
Thank you
Paul Kelley
Ms. Mairs,
Here in Michigan I can't grow almonds, but I eat them joyously
for their good flavor and health benefits.
Please encourage CCOF to address this threat of pasturized almonds
still to be labeled as "natural". I fear the continued
degradation of the purity of our food sources.
Suzanne Hoff
To: Peggy Miars,
Executive Director, California Certified Organic Farmers
Dear Ms.Miars,
As a consumer, I do not want corporate interests to take away
my right to raw almonds, and I encourage you to do all in your
power to reverse this threat to consumer freedom. Surely
a method of assuring safety--other than fumigating with toxic
substances such as propylene oxide, and possibly even irradiation--can
be found, particularly for organic products.
As a frequent consumer of raw, organic almonds, I fear I may
have to begin purchasing almonds from other countries rather
than subject my body to treated almonds.
Thank you in advance for your efforts on behalf of myself and
other consumers.
Dr. Kathryn Bulver
Charleston, Illinois
"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase
a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." Benjamin
Franklin
In the U.S. we live in a fear based society so any idea - no
matter how nefarious or insipid it may be - can be marketed and
put into law and enforced. Another tactic is to introduce a law,
behind closed doors and without public scrutiny, with the intent
of keeping the public uniformed. History shows us that there's
nothing more "dangerous" to self-serving, corporate/private/government
interests than a well informed citizenry. Since human beings
have been farming and cultivating seeds, for thousands of years
and in a sustainable way, it was always done organically and
with much success. I would challenge anything grown by big agribusiness,
which is either bio-engineered or saturated with chemical pesticides
and fertilizers, or both, to match the taste, texture and quality
of organically grown produce and the quality of the soil grown
by organic farmers. My grandparents had a small patch of land
in their yard, about 12' by 24', where they grew a variety of
vegetables. They composted and grew everything organically. The
vegetables were sometimes imperfect in shape, size and color
but the texture and flavors were superior to anything I've ever
bought at the store...or been served at a restaurant. They not
only yielded more than enough for themselves but had plenty to
share with their neighbors and to put into storage...and all
of this came from a small piece of land. So, when is enough going
to be enough? Ralph Nader, the consumer advocate, unsuccessfully
tried to require bio-engineered foods/GMO's to be labeled as
such but couldn't compete with the well financed lobbies that
opposed the labeling. Study after study showed that, overwhelmingly,
people would choose the food or food product that wasn't labeled
over the one labeled as containing genetically modified organisms.
To get around this, big agribusiness put the burden onto the
consumer who is assuming the produce or food products they are
buying are just that: wheat is wheat, corn is corn, tomatos are
tomatos, potatos are potatos and nothing else spliced with it
or created in a lab. It tells us a lot about the mindset of corporations
(big agribusiness) where they can hijack the language and get
away with calling foods grown in chemical pesticides and fertilizers
or recently contaminated land as "organic" and this
is currently happening. Who is the California Almond Board and
what powers give them their alleged legitimacy? Who are the board
members and what are their connections with those who will benefit
from this mandate? The intent of the California Almond Board
should be (glaringly) obvious as to why the CCOF was not invited
to the hearings. It should also be obvious that the FDA is not
serving the public interest by attempting to pervert the english
language by renaming something to obfuscate the reality of what
it actually is, i.e. "irradiation" becoming "pasteurization" because
of the negative connotations associated with the "radiation" part
of "irradiation"...and rightly so. I support the CCOF
and the organic farmers who refuse to compromise what is right
and just, for our freedom of choice and well-being of future
generations.
Thank you,
Raymond Powell
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN,
I LOVE ALMONDS AND ALL OTHER TYPES OF NUTS. I ASK YOU TO PLEASE
KEEP THEM SAFE AND FULLY DIGESTIBLE WITH ALL ENZYMES INTACT.
THIS MEANS TO NEVER SPRAY THEM WITH CHEMICALS OR PESTICIDES AND
KEEP THEM ORGANIC. THIS MEANS TO NEVER HEAT THEM OR MISTREAT
THEM WITH ANY PROCESSING OR GENETIC MODIFICATION. THIS MEANS
TO JUST GROW THEM AND HARVEST THEM WITH SIMPLICITY THE WAY NATURE
INTENDED SO THAT ALL CAN ENJOY THEIR ABUNDANCE AND HEALTH BENEFITS.
THOSE THAT GROW NEED TO TAKE CARE AND SPECIALIZE SO THAT OTHERS
MAY FOCUS ON THEIR OWN JOBS AND NOT WORRY ABOUT EVERY SINGLE
ITEM THAT THEY CONSUME FOR SUSTAINANCE IS CONTAMINATED OR DEVOID
OF NUTRIENTS. GREED AND SPEED ARE NOT THE ANSWER OR THE SOLUTION.
LISTEN TO THE ANCESTORS AND THINK ABOUT ALL THOSE OTHER PEOPLE,
YOUR PEOPLE WHO ARE DEPENDING ON YOU TO PUT THEIR SAFETY AND
WELL BEING AS THE TOP PRIORITY.
IT IS YOUR RESPONSIBILITY AND PRIVILEGE AS GROWERS AND FOOD
PROVIDERS TO LOVE THE PEOPLE WHO BUY AND CONSUME YOUR PRODUCTS
BY KEEPING THEIR WELL BEING AS THE BOTTOM LINE, NOT MASS CONSUMPTION,
NOT BIG BUSINESS, NOT BIG GOVERNMENT. TOP OF THE LINE PRODUCT
WILL HAVE TRUE SUSTAINABILITY AND KEEP YOU AND YOUR OWN FAMILIES
ALIVE, WELL, HEALTHY, HAPPY, AND SANE.
SINCERELY
JOEY CURTIS
Dear Ms Miars,
Please help the CCOF to protest against the pasteurization of
almonds!My husband and I eat raw organic almonds every day, they
are an important part of our life style.We will not buy pasteurized
almonds labelled as "raw".You are representing a lot
people who are concerned about their health which is why we choose
organic and raw foods.Please be the voice for us in this dilemma.
Thank you,
Nancy Lober, San Jose, Ca
Nature is the best healer. Why destroy the fundamental healing
properties of almonds? Science is supposed to work with nature,
not destroy it.
Mason Wright
Raw almonds are the most precious food - please please please
preserve these natural beauties - pasteurization of these nuts
is a shame and is not necessary - my family and i enjoy almonds
every day - they are a staple in our home, humans are RAW !!
- please do not America to destroy the natural nutrition of our
almond. thank you - Erin Tucker
Immediate steps must be taken to address the recently published
regulation requiring "treatment" of California almonds.
Thousands -- perhaps millions -- of people rely on raw organic
almonds precisely because they have not been treated in ways
that change their intrinsic nature.
That some of these treated almonds have been able to germinate
in no way demonstrates that there have not been changes in their
intrinsic nature.
The raw community never had an adequate opportunity to be heard
on this regulation first proposed by large California growers
who were fearful that isolated outbreaks of salmonella would
cause widespread damage to their markets. In fact, careful methods
used by small organic growers did not appear to raise problems
in this regard.
No one wants to be sick - but unfortuntely no one is keeping
track of people who have enjoyed improvements in their health
by means of a diet heavily weighted towards raw food. Surely
there are other means -- perhaps spot testing -- that would satisfy
both of these goals.
The regulation in question does not apply to almonds not from
California. As a result, consumer efforts to obtain almnods from
other sources could eventually work an extreme economic hardship
on the small organic growers who have faithfully built their
businesses and suppled raw organic almonds for many years.
To make matters worse, treated almonds can still be labeled
as "raw." So the consumer may not be getting what
he or she is paying for.
Since not one comment was received from consumers during the
public comment period for this regulation, it is obvious that
the methods used to reach the raw-almond consuming public were
grossly inadequate.
Hopefully the effective date of this regulation can be delayed
indefinitly until means can be achieved by which those who wish
to purchase truly raw organically grown almonds can do so.
Very truly yours,
Joan Levin
Chicago
Every time we turn around, someone is trying to kill all that
is good. I am getting so sick and tired of the manipulation tactics
and the so-called BIG BROTHER of our day and age. What does it
take to get these wise guys to see that they are poisoning our
people and planet.. Good grief - God made a perfect planet and
what makes them think that they can improve upon that. I pray
that the Big Almond will fight this battle for us and succeed.
Almonds are a part of our diet on a daily basis. It's the only
good snack left on this planet. Please, please, please get these "do
gooders" to stop this attack on our food. It's getting so
I don't even trust the word "organic" anymore
Leslie Ann Braun.
Dear Ms. Miars,
My children drink, and can tolerate, only almond milk. I do not
think they deserve to be exposed to any more chemicals, especially
in something so nutritious as the almond.
If we are living at a time when interested consumers can affect
what the government dictates, then why can we not stop the unnecessary,
and harmful, fumigation of nature's food? Why do we not get the
chance to 'vote' on this?
I cannot believe that someone can accept fumigation as a 'good'
thing. After all, the very word conjures up images of killing.
How can we be expected to put that negativity in our bodies and
be
able to thrive?
I hope you can assist us in some way in order to stop this outrageous
plan, or at the very least get someone to listen and understand
our plight.
Thank you for your assistance in this matter.
Christina Hanson
Hello,
I hope that this letter actually helps us in this fight against
those who would like to ruin this country's health. I would like
to see that we can somehow fight for the right to eat the things
that we choose and that raw almonds mean just that, raw and untreated.
This is our right as a "free" american country. At
some point we need to gather ourselves together and put our health
in our own hands and not in the hands of those with money who
can pass laws about what we eat without our consent. Action is
what we need, I'm not sure that sending letters upon letters
will help.
Sheralun Chamberlain
To: Peggy Miars,
Executive Director, California Certified Organic Farmers
Dear Ms.Miars,
I urge you to take action in order to save raw almonds. As a
consumer, I do not want corporate interests to take away my right
to raw almonds. Raw almonds are a large part of my diet and others
should continue to have access to nutritious, raw almonds, too.
Making real raw almonds hard to get will result in the consumption
of less nutritious, cooked almonds, sabtoaging the health of
millions of people. Moreover, the use of propylene oxide is horrendous;
the government should protect people from chemical exposure,
not subject them to it. This attack on raw almonds is also an
attack on the well-being of human bodies.
Furthermore, it is wrong for the California state government
to order the "pastuerization" of the almond crop because
of poor sanitation practices on the part of agribusinesses. The
corporations who fail to have good sanitation practices should
be punished, not the consumers. In addition, the government should
not let corporations mislead consumers by labeling these fumigated
almonds as raw.
For the sake of human beings all across the United States, I
beg you to have the CCOF protest against this mandate. At the
very least, there should be separate orders for organic almonds,
although ideally the conventional almonds should not be fumigated
either. I would be grateful for any actions that you take against
this mandate.
Peace,
Kasey Cox
Consumer
I'm very upset about what is being done to our food with this
new information on almonds. Please add my name to any list showing
that I oppose this. I sprout my almonds before eating them so
this will no longer be possible if they have been treated. I
also choose to spend my money purchasing organic just so that
I'm assured that they have not been treated so doing this will
make it where there are no assurances when we pay more for "organic" if
our food can still be treated and then labeled organic. Please
fight this for us. I was looking forward to purchasing new almonds
this fall and of course I'm a great fan of raw almond butter
and would hate to have to drop this from my diet. If this is
done to the almonds I will no longer eat almonds as I won't eat
them if they've been treated. If people stop buying almonds it
will really impact the CA economy.
Sincerely,
Ginny Skinner
Statham, GA
To: Miss Peggy Miars
Executive Director at CCOF
Ms. Miars I am writing this email in regards to the new regulations
involving pasturization of almonds. It is my understanding that
you are in a position to voice the concerns of us who are unable
to do so. It seems that we, in a country built on freedom of
choice, are watching that very freedom being chipped away at
an ever increasing rate. We are losing the ability to choose
the types of foods we wish to feed oursleves, our families, and
how we choose to nourish them as well. We are asking that this
new regulation be stopped before is implemented in September.
I thank you for your time in considering our request for assistance
in this matter.
Sincerely,
Misty Merck
Jesse,
It seems quite simple. Raw means raw.
Any policy to hinder the production and distribution of fresh
organic and raw products is a crime against our health and well
being. Please speak on my and my families behave. I am a breast
feeding mother and recognize that the largest recycling program
in existance is the birth of beautiful babies. Our sacred resources
air, water, and food are continually regenerated generation to
generation. When did pure and simple become the lies and misinformation
that we must wade through today? Continue your efforts. Thank
you.
Sincerely,
Bena Long
President
MindMovement, LLC
To CCOF
Please do whatever you can to contest the plans to allow almonds
to be treated with poisonous chemicals and still labeled raw
or even organic. I count on your organization to protect the
food supply from illconceived plans such as these.
Many thanks for all you do, Laura
Dear Ms. Miars,
Please protest the ruling of the California Almond Board to fumigate
all almonds, including organic almonds, beginning September 1,
2007 although they will be labeled "raw."
Thank you very much!
Margarita Walters
Carlsbad, CA
To the Executive Director of CCOF:
This is a request that you mobilize to protest the March 30,
2007 California Almond Board order requiring that, beginning
September 1, 2007, all almonds be fumigated either with steam
or propylene oxide - and that these almonds will still permitted
to be labeled as “raw”. At the least a separate marketing
order for organic almonds should be demanded. Otherwise people
like me, who eat raw and organic foods, will be forced to begin
purchasing almonds from other countries! Thank you so much for
your efforts! There is a large and rapidly-growing community
rooting for you.
Regards
Grace Leppin
Chicago, Illinois 60601
No, no, no! You can't kill our almonds! Do you know what happens
when you plant a "dead" almond? Absolutely nothing!
The same thing takes place in the human body--nothing, no life
force left in the almond to move through us, to nourish us, it's
vitality murdered! What was once a glorious gift from Nature
will soon be just another processed food.
Did you know that Louis Pasteur admitted in the end that the
pasteurization of milk was a mistake? This is a HUGE mistake!
If nothing else will stop you, think of the sales lost. A half-million
raw-food vegans in this country eat almonds daily. Do the math.
Qz
Dear Ms. Miars:
I was quite alarmed to hear that almonds will be required to
be pasteurized starting in September. I hope California Certified
Organic Farmers are doing everything they can to stop the California
Almond Board from mandating that all almonds be pasteurized.
Consumers have the right to make their own choices regarding
health and nutrition, and I will always choose raw and refuse "pasteurized."
There is a "Truth in Labeling Law" and we must see
that it is applied to everything we eat. Fumigated or steamed,
will not, cannot be passed off as raw. I will do all that I can
to help you reverse this ruling. We cannot stand idly by and
let the government ruin our health.
Thank you,
Susan Jorg
Estacada, Oregon
Dear Officials in California:
My family and friends support the efforts of Living Tree Community
to secure proper labeling of food. We also support all efforts
to prevent the forced degradation of food. If some group or company
has the energy, foresight, and patience to grow food properly
in accordance with the centuries old principles laid down by
the laws of nature let's make sure that we all support
them, and that no law persecutes those who go to these admirable
lengths.
James Joseph
Dear Ms. Miars,
I'm writing to ask, really beg you to defend our rights to truly
raw almonds. I feel that is is just another of our freedoms keep
being chipped away in the name of Fear and Ignorance. Please
help those of us who care about our health and freedom keep our
ability to have a choice. Thanks so much for all your intercession
on our behalf.
Lisa Brooks
I'm horrified.
I try to eat as large a percentage of my diet as I can solely
on organically grown foods. I don't want to have my body filled
with chemicals and pesticides that are just liable to cause
disease. Almonds fumigated with chemicals cannot be organic,
and I would not even consider them raw. I've read that raw
organic almonds are supposed to be by far the most healthy
to eat and that is what I buy. This will make it impossible
to buy healthy almonds grown here in the USA. And I agree that
after tasting almonds grown in spain, I think our almonds grown
here in the western USA are the best. Why are we ruining this
wonderful crop?
We the people should have a say in this matter. I am strongly
in favor of labeling all genetically engineere foods and I hope
I've never bought any. Similarly I'm strongly opposed to destroying
our organic almonds grown in the USA and I'll gladly sign any
petitions that will cancel this law that was simply thrust upon
us.
Jacob Litoff
Millis, MA 02054
Thank you living tree for caring enough to stay on top... someone
needs to with political correctness running rampant in the streets
it would seem that everything should be on the table. irradiated
food is just that and should be labeled as such. as an entire
country becomes aware of these labels (pasteurization and irradiation)
merging, and raw meaning practically nothing soon i wonder if
the loss of revenues for the stock holders of corp. america will
be affected when said country goes outside itself to purchase
REAL FOOD elsewhere. maybe they should be the target for this
insult to injury. and if organic food requires such labeling
and regulation, and i'm glad to know what i'm eating then i want
to know about genetically engineered food is labled as well.
that way at least, as the consumer i get to choose healthy, life
giving almonds today or pig gene induced tomato salad. i am the
consumer and inquiring minds do want to know.
i say take it take it to the streets. when money is affected
and enough loud voices "merge" mountains are moved.
look what's happened in the news over comments being made about
just about anyone and even Rap is being questioned for it's vulgarity.
while this is, or was land of freedom of speech(and i take no
sides) it just goes to show the power we have if used.
corporate america has already jumped on the green band wagon
like never before so it's, as they say in Hollywood THE PEOPLE'S
CHOICE AWARDS!
hope this helped. let me know if i can cook up anything else
for you.
live long...and shop, organically, of course!
lance spangler
It is terrible to fumigate natural and organic almonds. Adding
these chemicals is not a smart health decision. And, pasteurizing
destroys the vitality, nutrition and enzymes if the almonds,
as well as other foods. This has been proven by scientists including
nobel prize winners.
If anything, people should have a choice and they should be labeled
honestly instead if trying to hide the fact:
Raw Organic Almonds - and really mean organic and RAW Pasteurized
Fumigated Almonds. If you are afraid of labeling the truth, you
are instead promoting deception and lies.
Sincerely yours, Joseph Lucier
To: The California Certified Organic Farmers (CCOF)
Dear Ms. Miars,
I am very disappointed that there is a new regulation in California
to strilize almonds including organic ones and allow the label
to state that is "raw". I urge you to mobilize a compaign
to ask the Food and Drug Administration not to water down the
organic standand. I also ask you to help keep the organic almonds
from any type of "food irradiation" or "pasteurization.
Sincerly,
Jo Tang
Almonds are a major part of my diet. I need my food to be truly
natural,organic and raw. No longer having access to true raw
almonds is a an affront to my health, my freedoms as a human
being and an American citizen.
I respectfully urge you to engage your organization's power
to stop the universal pasteurization/fumigation order of the
California almond board. Raw foodists depend on almonds as the
premier nut in our diets. Our growing tribe of discerning consumers
are loyal and dependable customers who will choose to stop eating
almonds if you fail us. Our hopes and prayers are with you and
all who are willing to stand up for safe and natural foods.
Jill J Taylor, RN, MN
The Taylor Group, Inc.
Please leave our raw almonds alone...We want our almonds raw
and organic...we don't want them pasturized and we don't want
them fumigated with carcenegenic chemicals.
Lisa Montgomery
royersford pa 19468
I have recently read of changes made by the California Almond
Board regarding the "fumigation" of edible almonds.
I am writing in protest of this decision.
I choose to eat organic foods because I do not wish to consume
foods that have been tampered with ~ ie - that have been fumigated,
irradiated, or had pesticides utilized in the growing process.
I am objecting to this change and am insistent that I do not
eat additives of this sort and also encourage others not to consume
these types of foods via conversation and writings in my blog.
I would like to see this change not apply to foods in the organically
grown area.
Thank you,
Stacye Mehard
Norfolk, VA 23507
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR CCOF:
When is this insanity going to stop??? When is the American public
going to be afforded the decency to be informed about the pollutants
and poisons in our food that "big industry" farms continue
to sell to the public??? The desire to fumigate and pasteurize
raw almonds is founded by a very sick organization whose sole
motivation is nothing less than profit, gain and greed. Their
motivation is not motivated by the general well being of the
American public.
As a long time dairy consumer with skin allergies I have been
enthralled to discover that by switching to raw, organic almond
milk, made by hand in my own kitchen, that I have been able to
eradicate this life long discomfort and irritation.
I am not interested in buying almonds from anywhere else other
than those grown in my home state of California and I am certainly
not interested in buying almonds that have been fumigated or
pasteurized.
Please do whatever possible to stop this lunacy this distorted
and mis-informed proposal.
If there are politicians we need to write to reverse this please
let me know.
Dennis Cavallari
Hi Peggy,
Just read about the almond pasteurization & chemical treatment
ruling.
Please work to make the labeling accurate & customer friendly. "Raw" should
mean raw. Chemical treatment should definitely not be allowed
on organic almonds.
I love almonds and would like to continue eating them.
Karen
Blackberry Community Farm
To whom it may concern,
I just recieved the disturbing news that almonds are now to be
pasteurized and otherwise "treated" mandatorily. I
currently rely on real "raw" almonds and almond butter
for a large portion of my protein, but would seriously have to
consider not buying any almonds at all if this is to happen.
I prefer my food unaltered and in its most natural state, as
I know a lot of other people do as well. The attemtps over the
years of corporate agriculture to inundate the food crops with
genetic engeineering, pastuerization, irradiating and toxic-bathing
of food is not only altering otherwise wholesome food, but making
this planet and everyone who eats these foods unhealthy and toxic.
I understand that you have the potential strength in clout and
numbers to possibly reverse this new rule, and as a consumer
and health advocate I humbly but urgently request that you please
attemt to do so. Those that want to treat their almonds can go
ahead and do so, but to make it mandatory for all is unjust and
will creat a huge backlash in sluggish sales, as many in and
out of the raw food movement rely on pure natural almonds.
Thank you in advance for anything you can do!!
Sincerely,
Elisha Passafero
Dear Peggy,
I am an Associate Professor of Biology at an Eastern University
and have conducted research on Biodynamic farming methods. I
am concerned about the growing trend in the US to label processed
food as "raw," "natural," or even "organic." The
latest step in the process seems to be the move to require that
all almonds produced in California will have to be pasteurized
beginning this year. While I understand the desire to protect
the consumer's health, it seems imprudent to me to require this
measure across the board. I would greatly appreciate it if your
organization could investigate the matter and take the appropriate
steps to assure that raw, organic almost remain raw, and organic.
Best wishes,
Dr. Bruce Kirchoff
Secretary Mike Johanns
United States Department of Agriculture
1400 Independence Ave SW
Whitten Building – Suite 200A
Washington, D.C. 20250
Reference: PASTEURIZATION OF ALMONDS
7 CFR Part 981, Docket No. FV06-981-1FR
INSANE IDEA – INSANE RULE
I DON’T EVEN WHAT TO KNOW WHO MAKES THE MONEY ON THIS ONE
BUT I COULD PROBABLY GUESS AND BE RIGHT
Dear Secretary Johanns,
I am normally a pretty calm person but this proposed rule has
me completely outraged. NO, NO, NO. NO. NO. NO, NO, NO, - THIS
MUST BE STOPPED!!!!!! I don’t normally swear and I won’t
now either but I want you to know that I’m sparing you
many words I’d like to say.
For the past 20 years, my husband, myself and our family strive
to find and eat the most “ORGANIC” and “NATURAL” foods.
Sadly these foods have dwindled severely over the years. We own
and operate a small 100% ORGANIC Health Food Café, Juice
Bar and Health Food Store in Florida. RAW FOODS ARE AN IMPORTANT
PART OF OUR BUSINESS. Our shelves are not full because I have
such a diffucult time finding “REAL FOOD” that meets
our standards – foods that I and my family would put in
our bodies. Unlike some people, we won’t sell inferior,
altered products. We only sell what I would eat myself. THIS |