RADIOACTIVITY AND CLIMATE DISRUPTION
by Joel Carlinsky

[Editor's Note: Here is an altogether original look at global warming. The author argues that the main causal factor is not so much the buildup of CO2 as the proliferation of nuclear reactors. This deserves careful consideration. The author is a tireless worker on behalf of the betterment of humankind. You might wish to consider his other works, as he says,

For two years, I moderated a mailing list on the science of orgone energy first developed by Wilhelm Reich. When the list was discontinued, there were over 2,000 posts in the archives, and rather than let them be deleted and all that information lost, one of the list members volunteered to edit them into a book.

It has taken a while, but now it is almost ready. If you are interested in the science of orgone energy, the life energy, discovered by Wilhelm Reich, go to www.orgonescience.blogspot.com and read more about it.

Then, if you think you might want to buy a copy, please send us an e-mail at orgonebook@yahoo.com and we will put you on the list for a reserved copy at a reduced price.]

It simply is not possible for BOTH Reich and the mainstream scientists to be right, and since I have seen overwhelming evidence that there is something going on in the atmosphere in relation to radioactivity that orthodox science cannot explain and orgonomic science can, until the scientists get their heads out of the sand and come up with an explanation that better fits the facts, instead of just denying the facts, I will have no choice but to go on thinking Reich was right and orthodox science is wrong.

I am quite familiar with the mainstream theory of radioactivity, and I just do not buy it. I cannot, because I have seen solid evidence that radioactivity does not work the way physics say it does.

The reason I consider nuclear power intolerably dangerous is that it is something completely different from what orthodox physics thinks it is. The physicists think, as a result of a flawed experiment done by the French Academy in 1900, that radioactive material is unstable, is breaking down internally, and little bits of atoms are being shot out of it. They think that if one of these little bits of an atom hits a cell it can cause damage by breaking a little part of the cell. They think the effects of radioactivity can be shielded by a thick containment vessel of steel or concrete. All these ideas are wrong. In fact, there is no such thing as radioactivity in the sense orthodox science thinks there is.

The real source of the energy involved is not internal, but external, in the ether around the radioactive substance. So-called "radioactive" materials are IRRITANTS that irritate the surrounding orgone (ether) into a state of abnormal excitation. This excited state (oranur), produces effects which can be divided into primary effects and secondary effects. The secondary effects are the ones that can be blocked by shielding and detected by ordinary instruments. The primary effects cannot be blocked by any amount of any known material and are usually not detected by the instruments physicists use.

These effects can slow down the pulsation of orgone, which in the slowed down state is called DOR, and this DOR is toxic to all living organisms, but the symptoms are so widely variable that there is no consistent symptom picture for orthodox medical science to notice. There is only a generalized decrease in biological functioning, which then causes each individual to react differently, depending on individual predisposition.

The slowing down of the normal pulsation of the orgone surrounding the reactor, which takes place whether there is a containment vessel or not, also has effects on the weather. Since it is the same energy in both atmosphere and organism, the weather reacts the same way a living body does. It suffers a diminution of pulsation and vitality.

Since these primary effects of radioactive irritation of the surrounding field are not subject to the inverse square law, there is no real limit to the distance from a reactor at which the effects can show up.

When I did my oranur work in Massachusetts I was keeping a close eye on the world weather maps. There were effects clearly caused by my work as far west as Oregon and as far east as Sweden. The conclusion was inescapeable: Any strong source of oranur excitation has a global effect.

EVERY NUCLEAR REACTOR AFFECTS THE WHOLE PLANET!! It is this, not the possible "escape" of some radioactive gases or particulates, that is the real threat from nuclear power.

NO nuclear reactor of any design is safe and no nuclear reactor of any design can ever be made safe. The oranur effect cannot be contained and there is no limit to how far it can reach. It has nothing to do with the reasons the mainstream anti-nuke movement presents to the public for being against nuclear power.

I have talked with many in the anti- nuke movement, including some of the well-known leaders of the movement. Some of them were open-minded enough that I was able to explain my ideas on the subject without too much negative reaction. But they all would then go on to explain that if they tried to take on the scientific establishment on the issue of basic nuclear physics, they would not only lose, but discredit themselves as total flakes. They have no choice but to try to argue their cause on conventional physics grounds. Being known as crackpots would not help them win in the arena of practical politics.

They are correct in this ascessment, but from within the framework of conventional science, they are wrong to be opposed to nuclear power; if one beleives the theories of the mainstrream scienrtists, nuclear power is perfectly safe, or at least can be made safe. IF YOU BELIEVE THE THEORIES OF CONVENTIONAL PHYSICS! But I don't. Do you? If so, why?

The global warming/greenhouse gases theory as currently constructed, is nothing but a public relations scam to legitimize nuclear power. I see no other reason for it. It is just a way for the nuke industry and the U.S. military machine, which wants the reactor products for weaponry, to scam the public into accepting nukes as cleaner and safer than burning coal or oil.

The so-called science behind the global warming myth is so flawed that I do not see how anyone could take it seriously. But there really IS a serious and dangerous atmospheric crisis going on in the atmosphere of this planet and it really IS manmade, not part of any natural cycle or due to any natural causes.

The weather is losing its stability, patterns are breaking down and weather is going to extremes, with alternating drought and floods, heat waves and cold waves. Abnormally severe weather events are becoming more common.

The atmosphere is becoming more unreliable and unpredictable. This randomness is giving the impression that there is something to the "global warming" scenario, and the greenhouse gases theory it is based on. The climate is changing, there is no doubt about that, but it is not changing in any one particular direction. And the changes that are happening have nothing to do with CO2.

The current wave of concern over global warming is based on the theory that the atmosphere is a "heat engine" driven by differences in temperature. The belief that heat from the sun is the moving force of the atmosphere leads to the belief that trapping of more heat by so-called greenhouse gases will lead to changes in weather and climate. The trouble with the heat engine theory is there is no way for it to explain why a set of pipes grounded into water would have any effect at all on weather, let alone such powerful and widespread effects as have regularly been observed to occur from cloudbusting operations.

The effective functioning of the cloudbuster leads directly to the conclusion that the atmosphere MUST be driven by charge, discharge, pulsation, flow and alternating expansion and contraction of the energetic field of the earth, a field within which the atmosphere exists and upon which it depends for its maintenance.

If one has once become convinced that a cloudbuster can indeed affect weather, it is a logical impossibility to go on accepting that the heat engine theory of the atmosphere is correct. On the other hand, there is indeed ample evidence that there is SOMETHING strange going on with the weather. There ARE changes in climate underway. So, if the cause is NOT a greenhouse effect from greenhouse gases, what is it?

The orgonomic theory is that the changes in weather and climate going on are due to alterations in the pulsation and flowing of the energetic "atmosphere" of the earth. These changes are known to be caused by the burden of radioactivity released into the environment by the nuclear industry/weapons programs since 1945. The oranur experiment done by Reich in 1951 and numerous other observations since by a number of people, including my own experimental work, lead to the conclusion that it is the radiation burden and not the greenhouse gases causing the changing climate.

These two theories of the atmosphere are not competing on even ground. The heat engine theory has the support of almost all scientists, all governments, and most of the public. The orgonomic theory has the support of only a handful of people, most of whom have no resources or influence.

A further handicap is that the cultish atmosphere that has grown up around Reich’s findings, especially his orgone findings, has caused many people who are blatantly mystical, paranoid or otherwise lacking in credibility to be attracted to orgonomy and their presence and obvious irrationality tends to discredit the ideas which they have espoused.

The nuclear physicists think they know all about radioactivity but their ideas about it are wrong. They consider radioactivity a property of the radioactive material itself, while the orgonomic view is that it is the surrounding energetic continuum that reacts to the presence of that material with an excitation that shows up on instruments and damages flesh.

The "internal disintegration" theory of radioactivity is so strongly entrenched in the thinking of the physics community that anyone with even a grammar school education knows about it, and almost all of the population believes it. And this theory has no way to fit in the observations by Reich and many others following his lead, that radioactivity can indeed affect the weather.

The public relations campaign over global warming and greenhouse gases has reached a fever pitch. It has become one of the two biggest public events of our time, (along with the take-over of the United States by a Fascistic dictatorship, an event that is not unrelated). The sales campaign to sell the world’s public on the need to reduce greenhouse gases has largely succeeded. The major practical result has been to make nuclear power look green and clean by comparison.

The major nations of the world are getting ready to build a very large number of new nuclear reactors to take the place of burning coal and oil for power production. The world will probably not survive the existence of so many nuclear reactors. Ironically, it is the environmentalists, demanding a reduction in burning of relatively harmless coal and oil, who are driving us ever-closer to extinction by their ignorance of the real facts of atmospheric functioning and their well-ment, but ill-founded fear of greenhouse gases.